H.R.427 - Regulations from the Executive in Need of.
In an op-ed published in USA Today last month, Kerpen said that, in 2015, Trump’s campaign provided him with a statement in which Trump vowed to “sign the REINS Act should it reach my desk as.Pros and Cons of the recent REINs act I'm curious, in layman's terms, what are the pros and cons of the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act, which was voted on in 2015 but failed, and recently re-voted on and passed the house early this month.Floor Situation. On Tuesday, July 28, 2015, the House will consider H.R. 427, the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015, under a structured rule. H.R. 427 was introduced on January 21, 2015, by Rep. Todd Young (R-IN) and was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition, to the Committees on Rules and the Budget.
The REINS Act would require major regulations to come before Congress for an up-or-down vote. This structural change would limit federal agencies' ability to impose sweeping mandates without concern for economic cost and give the American people an elected official to hold accountable when excessive regulation results in lost jobs or wages.April 14, 2015. The United States Senate. Washington, D.C. 20510. The United States House of Representatives. Washington, DC 20515. Dear Members of Congress: We are writing, as individuals, to express our opposition to passage of the REINS Act. In signing the letter, we have included our titles and the institutions at which we teach for.
The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed a bill called the REINS Act (H.R. 427), which would require any standard passed by an Executive Agency, including standards for environmental and consumer protection, occupational safety, and public health, to be approved by Congress within 70 days.
